Journal of Forest Economics

500 papers and 8.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 500 papers published in Journal of Forest Economics in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Forest Economics usually cover Global and Planetary Change (366 papers), Economics and Econometrics (252 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (73 papers) specifically the topics of Forest Management and Policy (315 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (220 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Forest Economics are John B. Loomis, Henrik Lindhjem, Gregory S. Amacher, David H. Newman, Knut Veisten, Joseph Buongiorno, Colin Price, Marianne Zandersen, Jay Sullivan and Sam Gregory.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Forest Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Forest Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Forest Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Forest Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Forest Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Forest Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Forest Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025