Countries where authors publish in Multinational Business Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Multinational Business Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Multinational Business Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Multinational Business Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Multinational Business Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Multinational Business Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Multinational Business Review.
About Multinational Business Review
The 654 papers published in Multinational Business Review in the last decades have received a total of 9.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Multinational Business Review usually cover Strategy and Management (420 papers), Accounting (232 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (124 papers) specifically the topics of International Business and FDI (327 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (205 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (130 papers), Global trade and economics (104 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (68 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (51 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (28 papers) and International Student and Expatriate Challenges (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Multinational Business Review are Alan M. Rugman, Roger Strange, Antonella Zucchella, Klaus E. Meyer, Lorraine Eden, Rajneesh Narula, Hoon Cheol Park, Douglas E. Thomas, Ilan Alon and Peter J. Buckley.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.