Multinational Business Review

636 papers and 8.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 636 papers published in Multinational Business Review in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Multinational Business Review usually cover Strategy and Management (410 papers), Accounting (228 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (120 papers) specifically the topics of International Business and FDI (318 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (201 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (127 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Multinational Business Review are Alan M. Rugman, Roger Strange, Antonella Zucchella, Klaus E. Meyer, Lorraine Eden, Rajneesh Narula, Hoon Cheol Park, Douglas E. Thomas, Ilan Alon and Peter J. Buckley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Multinational Business Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Multinational Business Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Multinational Business Review.

Countries where authors publish in Multinational Business Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Multinational Business Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Multinational Business Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Multinational Business Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025