Health Economics Policy and Law

508 papers and 7.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 508 papers published in Health Economics Policy and Law in the last decades have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Health Economics Policy and Law usually cover General Health Professions (334 papers), Economics and Econometrics (327 papers) and Finance (69 papers) specifically the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (228 papers), Global Health Care Issues (155 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (154 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health Economics Policy and Law are Di McIntyre, Chris Ham, Anthony J. Culyer, Stephen Birch, Erik Schut, John E. Ataguba, Filip Meheus, Emily Lancsar, Jordan J. Louviere and Richard M. Scheffler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Health Economics Policy and Law

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Health Economics Policy and Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health Economics Policy and Law.

Countries where authors publish in Health Economics Policy and Law

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health Economics Policy and Law. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health Economics Policy and Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Economics Policy and Law more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025