Invertebrate Neuroscience

355 papers and 6.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 355 papers published in Invertebrate Neuroscience in the last decades have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Invertebrate Neuroscience usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (234 papers), Molecular Biology (122 papers) and Insect Science (71 papers) specifically the topics of Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (206 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (53 papers) and Cephalopods and Marine Biology (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Invertebrate Neuroscience are David B. Sattelle, Ke Dong, Andrew K. Jones, Peter D. Evans, Daniel Cordova, I. Denholm, Neil S. Millar, Timothy R. Cheek, Jon W. Jacklet and Fernando Calahorro.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Invertebrate Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Invertebrate Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Invertebrate Neuroscience.

Countries where authors publish in Invertebrate Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Invertebrate Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Invertebrate Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Invertebrate Neuroscience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025