Jay Sullivan

849 citations
36 papers · 657 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Jay Sullivan

36 papers receiving 590 citations

Peers

Jay Sullivan
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Global and Planetary Change 492
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 120
  • Economics and Econometrics 249
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 67
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48
Replace Matthias Dieter with:
Matthias Dieter Germany
Robert K. Grala United States
Peichen Gong Sweden
Gregory S. Latta United States
Rajan Parajuli United States
Marjanke Hoogstra-Klein Netherlands
Shushuai Zhu United States
Changyou Sun United States
René H. Germain United States
Stephen C. Grado United States
Jay Sullivan relative to Matthias Dieter Germany Matthias Dieter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Matthias Dieter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Sullivan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Sullivan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Sullivan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Sullivan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Sullivan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Sullivan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Sullivan. The network helps show where Jay Sullivan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jay Sullivan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Sullivan Line = papers co-authored together Jay Sullivan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003160
2 2003110
3 200537
4 198235
5 199427
6 200123
7 199223
8 200922
9 200819
10 201618
11 201316
12 199315
13 201214
14 201613
15 202111
16 200511
17 200211
18 198810
19 200910
20 20169

About Jay Sullivan

Jay Sullivan is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Economics and Econometrics, Mechanics of Materials and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Management and Policy (24 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (13 papers), Forest ecology and management (13 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (8 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (5 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (5 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (2 papers) and Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (492 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (120 citations), Economics and Econometrics (249 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (67 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (48 citations). Jay Sullivan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Senegal and Malawi. Frequent co-authors include Gregory S. Amacher, Sam Gregory, David N. Wear, Sara Chapman, J. Douglas Wellman, M. Chad Bolding, Scott M. Barrett, G.S. Amacher, Ying Xu and Christopher Asaro. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Science, Journal of Forest Economics, Forest Policy and Economics, New Forests and Resources Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact