Lithic Technology

6.1k citations
601 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Archeology top 1%
    • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
    • Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
    • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
    • Evolution and Paleontology Studies

Papers in

    • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies 88
    • Archaeology and Rock Art Studies 60
    • Archaeological and Geological Studies 38
    • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies 329
    • Evolution and Paleontology Studies 32

Lithic Technology

471 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers

Lithic Technology
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Archeology 921
  • Paleontology 4.3k
  • Anthropology 4.7k
  • Archeology 2.0k
  • Geography, Planning and Development 345
Replace Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association with:
Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association United States
L Anthropologie France
European Journal of Archaeology United Kingdom
North American Archaeologist United States
African Archaeological Review United States
Journal of World Prehistory United States
Southeastern Archaeology United States
Journal of Archaeological Research United States
Norwegian Archaeological Review Norway
Environmental Archaeology United Kingdom
Lithic Technology relative to Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association United States Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Lithic Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Lithic Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Lithic Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lithic Technology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Lithic Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Lithic Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Lithic Technology.

About Lithic Technology

The 601 papers published in Lithic Technology in the last decades have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Lithic Technology usually cover Archeology (79 papers), Paleontology (348 papers), Anthropology (365 papers), Archeology (180 papers) and Geography, Planning and Development (25 papers) specifically the topics of Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (343 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (329 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (88 papers), Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (81 papers), Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (60 papers), Archaeological and Geological Studies (38 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (32 papers) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Lithic Technology are Michael Shott, Brian Hayden, Metin I. Eren, C. Britt Bousman, Frédéric Sellet, Harold L. Dibble, Grant McCall, Daniel S. Amick, Juliet E. Morrow and Leland W. Patterson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact