Philosophical Explorations

526 papers and 4.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 526 papers published in Philosophical Explorations in the last decades have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Philosophical Explorations usually cover Philosophy (332 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (293 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (143 papers) specifically the topics of Free Will and Agency (155 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (153 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (145 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophical Explorations are Jesse Prinz, Thomas Nadelhoffer, Antti Kauppinen, Robert Sugden, Shaun Gallagher, John McDowell, Luc Boltanski, Laurent Thévenot, Mikko Salmela and Lynne Rudder Baker.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Philosophical Explorations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophical Explorations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophical Explorations.

Countries where authors publish in Philosophical Explorations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophical Explorations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophical Explorations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophical Explorations more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025