Countries where authors publish in Neurosurgery Quarterly
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurosurgery Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurosurgery Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurosurgery Quarterly more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Neurosurgery Quarterly
This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurosurgery Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurosurgery Quarterly.
About Neurosurgery Quarterly
The 719 papers published in Neurosurgery Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Neurosurgery Quarterly usually cover Neurology (273 papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (176 papers), Genetics (77 papers), Surgery (314 papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (105 papers) specifically the topics of Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (110 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (98 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (95 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (89 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (89 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (77 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (69 papers) and Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurosurgery Quarterly are Donlin M. Long, Henry Brem, Rafael J. Tamargo, Don M. Long, Nikolai Bogduk, Giancarlo Barolat, Susan M. Lord, Mary Louise Hlavin, Russell W. Hardy and Bernard Williams.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.