Neurosurgery Quarterly

702 papers and 5.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 702 papers published in Neurosurgery Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Neurosurgery Quarterly usually cover Surgery (306 papers), Neurology (269 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (172 papers) specifically the topics of Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (107 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (96 papers) and Meningioma and schwannoma management (94 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurosurgery Quarterly are Donlin M. Long, Henry Brem, Rafael J. Tamargo, Don M. Long, Nikolai Bogduk, Giancarlo Barolat, Susan M. Lord, Russell W. Hardy, Mary Louise Hlavin and Bernard Williams.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neurosurgery Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurosurgery Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurosurgery Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Neurosurgery Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurosurgery Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurosurgery Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurosurgery Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025