Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and ComplexitySouth Korea
International Journal of Emerging MarketsChina
Review of Managerial ScienceGermany
International Journal of Innovation ManagementGermany
Industry and InnovationItaly
IEEE Engineering Management ReviewUnited States
Journal of Engineering and Technology ManagementUnited States
Strategic ChangeUnited Kingdom
Management Research ReviewUnited States
Creativity and Innovation ManagementUnited States
Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and ComplexitySouth KoreaView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · 1×
×0.97.0kSM
×0.96.3kEE
×1.04.6kMARKE
×1.14.7kMTI
×1.24.6kSPS
Citations per year, relative to Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Innovation & Knowledge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Innovation & Knowledge more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Innovation & Knowledge
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Innovation & Knowledge.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.