Countries where authors publish in Journal of financial reporting & accounting
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of financial reporting & accounting. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of financial reporting & accounting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of financial reporting & accounting more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of financial reporting & accounting
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of financial reporting & accounting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of financial reporting & accounting.
About Journal of financial reporting & accounting
The 715 papers published in Journal of financial reporting & accounting in the last decades have received a total of 9.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of financial reporting & accounting usually cover Accounting (587 papers), Strategy and Management (334 papers) and Finance (119 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (426 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (346 papers) and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (154 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of financial reporting & accounting are Sandra Alves, Guido Paolucci, Elisa Menicucci, Mustafa Mohd Hanefah, Anis Jarboui, Abdulhadi Ibrahim, Manaf Al‐Okaily, Helmi A. Boshnak, Z. I. Ali and Khaled Hussainey.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.