JMIR Serious Games

634 papers and 8.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 634 papers published in JMIR Serious Games in the last decades have received a total of 8.6k indexed citations. Papers published in JMIR Serious Games usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (149 papers), Physiology (124 papers) and Applied Psychology (109 papers) specifically the topics of Educational Games and Gamification (102 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (95 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (83 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JMIR Serious Games are Julie Prescott, Jim Lumsden, Elizabeth A. Edwards, David Coyle, Natalia Lawrence, Marcus R. Munafò, Cameron Lister, Joshua H. West, Till Bärnighausen and Sandra Barteit.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in JMIR Serious Games

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JMIR Serious Games. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JMIR Serious Games.

Countries where authors publish in JMIR Serious Games

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JMIR Serious Games. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JMIR Serious Games with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JMIR Serious Games more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025