Journal of Library Metadata

223 papers and 1.2k indexed citations

About

The 223 papers published in Journal of Library Metadata in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Library Metadata usually cover Information Systems (169 papers), Artificial Intelligence (75 papers) and Conservation (70 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Systems (98 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (68 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Library Metadata are Oksana L. Zavalina, Jian Qin, Timothy W. Cole, Jane Greenberg, Diane Rasmussen Pennington, Besiki Stvilia, Ixchel M. Faniel, Elizabeth Yakel, Heather Lea Moulaison and Dong Joon Lee.

In The Last Decade

Journal of Library Metadata

193 papers receiving 999 citations

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Library Metadata

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Library Metadata. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Library Metadata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Library Metadata more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Library Metadata

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Library Metadata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Library Metadata.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026