Circulation Heart Failure

1.8k papers and 82.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Circulation Heart Failure in the last decades have received a total of 82.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Circulation Heart Failure usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.3k papers), Surgery (452 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (291 papers) specifically the topics of Heart Failure Treatment and Management (621 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (535 papers) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (285 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Circulation Heart Failure are Margaret M. Redfield, Barry A. Borlaug, Gregg C. Fonarow, Javed Butler, John J.V. McMurray, Adrian F. Hernandez, Larry A. Allen, Milton Packer, Scott D. Solomon and Michael R. Zile.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Circulation Heart Failure

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Circulation Heart Failure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Circulation Heart Failure.

Countries where authors publish in Circulation Heart Failure

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Circulation Heart Failure. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Circulation Heart Failure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Circulation Heart Failure more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025