Clinical Epidemiology

1.2k papers and 39.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Clinical Epidemiology in the last decades have received a total of 39.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Epidemiology usually cover Epidemiology (312 papers), Oncology (210 papers) and Surgery (182 papers) specifically the topics of Chronic Disease Management Strategies (94 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (81 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Epidemiology are Véra Ehrenstein, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Morten Schmidt, Lars Pedersen, Sigrún Alba Jóhannesdóttir Schmidt, Susan M. Sirmans, Eldon A. Shaffer, Rajveer Hundal, Rune Erichsen and P. D. Ready.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Epidemiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Epidemiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Epidemiology.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Epidemiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Epidemiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Epidemiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Epidemiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025