Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications
20043.0k citationsChitu Okoli, Suzanne D. PawlowskiInformation & Managementprofile →
A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research
20101.2k citationsChitu Okoli et al.SSRN Electronic Journalprofile →
A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review
2015872 citationsChitu OkoliCommunications of the Association for Information Systemsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Chitu Okoli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chitu Okoli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chitu Okoli more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chitu Okoli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chitu Okoli. The network helps show where Chitu Okoli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chitu Okoli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chitu Okoli.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chitu Okoli based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Chitu Okoli. Chitu Okoli is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Okoli, Chitu, et al.. (2015). Business Models for Free and Open Source Software: Insights from a Delphi Study. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
4.
Mesgari, Mostafa, Chitu Okoli, & Ana Ortíz de Guinea. (2015). Affordance-based User Personas : A mixed-method Approach to Persona Development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.11 indexed citations
5.
Okoli, Chitu & Ning Wang. (2015). Business Models for Online Education and Open Educational Resources: Insights from a Delphi Study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.3 indexed citations
6.
Okoli, Chitu, et al.. (2013). Sustainability of veterinary drugs against field isolates of E. maxima.. 2(2). 65–67.1 indexed citations
Chen, Ye-Sho, Chitu Okoli, & Lihua Huang. (2005). Strategic Growth of Firms in the Digital Economy: A Simonian Research Agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 7(2). 5.1 indexed citations
Okoli, Chitu & Suzanne D. Pawlowski. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management. 42(1). 15–29.3017 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Okoli, Chitu, et al.. (2004). Critical success factors for telemedicine in Ethiopia. 426–429.6 indexed citations
15.
Okoli, Chitu. (2003). Experts' Perceptions of Infrastructural and Institutional Factors for Effective E-Commerce in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 451.1 indexed citations
Okoli, Chitu, Ye-Sho Chen, & P. Pete Chong. (2002). STRATEGIC GROWTH OF FIRMS IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY: SIMULATION AND RESEARCH PROPOSAL. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 87.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.