This map shows the geographic impact of research published in INDIAN DRUGS. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in INDIAN DRUGS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites INDIAN DRUGS more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in INDIAN DRUGS. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in INDIAN DRUGS.
About INDIAN DRUGS
The 739 papers published in INDIAN DRUGS in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Papers published in INDIAN DRUGS usually cover Pharmaceutical Science (137 papers), Analytical Chemistry (217 papers) and Pharmacology (72 papers) specifically the topics of Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (211 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (112 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (104 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (75 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (72 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (67 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (57 papers) and Synthesis and biological activity (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in INDIAN DRUGS are Mayank Thakur, Annie Shirwaikar, H. D. Revanasiddappa, Somnath D. Bhinge, Abhay Chowdhary, Mahadev Rao, Mukesh C. Sharma, K. Satyanarayana, Zaheer Abbas and Kalyani Srinivasan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.