Human & Experimental Toxicology

4.0k papers and 78.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.0k papers published in Human & Experimental Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 78.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Human & Experimental Toxicology usually cover Molecular Biology (970 papers), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (735 papers) and Plant Science (628 papers) specifically the topics of Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (404 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (343 papers) and Poisoning and overdose treatments (342 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human & Experimental Toxicology are Edward J. Calabrese, L.A. Baldwin, Mohammad Abdollahi, A.D. Dayan, Alan J. Paine, Frédéric J. Baud, R. Kroes, Shahin Shadnia, Mark P. Mattson and Somayyeh Karami‐Mohajeri.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Human & Experimental Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human & Experimental Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human & Experimental Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Human & Experimental Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human & Experimental Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human & Experimental Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human & Experimental Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025