Journal of Applied Toxicology

4.2k papers and 94.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.2k papers published in Journal of Applied Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 94.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Applied Toxicology usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.3k papers), Molecular Biology (952 papers) and Cancer Research (680 papers) specifically the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (590 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (443 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (414 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Applied Toxicology are Philippa D. Darbre, L. Magós, Pablo Muriel, Philip W. Harvey, Alice Hontela, Meng Tang, R. von Burg, P Hunt, B. S. Smith and Ian Kimber.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Applied Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Applied Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Applied Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Applied Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Applied Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Applied Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Applied Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025