History of Philosophy Quarterly

316 papers and 883 indexed citations i.

About

The 316 papers published in History of Philosophy Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 883 indexed citations. Papers published in History of Philosophy Quarterly usually cover Philosophy (186 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (66 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (36 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Philosophy and Thought (61 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (43 papers) and Historical Philosophy and Science (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in History of Philosophy Quarterly are Pauline Kleingeld, Stewart Duncan, Lara Denis, Alexander Nehamas, Jane L. McIntyre, David B. Wong, Gerald J. Postema, Terence Parsons, Donald L. M. Baxter and Hagop Sarkissian.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in History of Philosophy Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in History of Philosophy Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in History of Philosophy Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in History of Philosophy Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in History of Philosophy Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in History of Philosophy Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites History of Philosophy Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025