Heart Failure Reviews

1.7k papers and 46.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Heart Failure Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 46.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Heart Failure Reviews usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.3k papers), Molecular Biology (321 papers) and Surgery (316 papers) specifically the topics of Heart Failure Treatment and Management (491 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (427 papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (196 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Heart Failure Reviews are Edward G. Lakatta, William B. Kannel, José Marı́n-Garcı́a, Bodh I. Jugdutt, Janet T. Peterson, Hani N. Sabbah, Naranjan S. Dhalla, Derek J. Hausenloy, Derek M. Yellon and Gary D. Lopaschuk.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Heart Failure Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Heart Failure Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Heart Failure Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Heart Failure Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Heart Failure Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Heart Failure Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heart Failure Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025