Biomicrofluidics

51.5k citations
1.9k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
    • Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
    • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
    • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
    • Biosensors and Analytical Detection
    • Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
    • Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
    • Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

Papers in

    • Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies 982
    • Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications 891
    • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation 457
    • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research 454
    • Biosensors and Analytical Detection 189
    • Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies 162

Biomicrofluidics

1.9k papers receiving 50.7k citations

Peers

Biomicrofluidics
Comparison fields: 5 of 199
  • Biomedical Engineering 40.5k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 12.8k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 1.9k
  • Bioengineering 1.2k
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 1.3k
Replace Microfluidics and Nanofluidics with:
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics United States
ACS Central Science United States
Biomedical Microdevices United States
European Biophysics Journal Germany
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology United States
Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology United States
Particle & Particle Systems Characterization China
Science and Technology of Advanced Materials Japan
Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science United States
The European Physical Journal E France
Biomicrofluidics relative to Microfluidics and Nanofluidics United States Microfluidics and Nanofluidics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Biomicrofluidics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biomicrofluidics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biomicrofluidics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biomicrofluidics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Biomicrofluidics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biomicrofluidics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biomicrofluidics.

About Biomicrofluidics

The 1.9k papers published in Biomicrofluidics in the last decades have received a total of 51.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Biomicrofluidics usually cover Biomedical Engineering (1.7k papers), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (85 papers), Aging (16 papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (505 papers) and Bioengineering (35 papers) specifically the topics of Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (982 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (891 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (457 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (454 papers), Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies (295 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (189 papers), Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies (162 papers) and Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (100 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biomicrofluidics are Ronald Pethig, Leslie Y. Yeo, James Friend, Nam‐Trung Nguyen, Wei Shen, David R. Ballerini, Giovanna Tomaiuolo, Hsueh‐Chia Chang, Xu Li and Matteo Altissimo.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact