JAMA Ophthalmology

2.5k papers and 63.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in JAMA Ophthalmology in the last decades have received a total of 63.1k indexed citations. Papers published in JAMA Ophthalmology usually cover Ophthalmology (1.8k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (944 papers) and Epidemiology (404 papers) specifically the topics of Retinal Diseases and Treatments (804 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (622 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (406 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JAMA Ophthalmology are Richard F. Spaide, James M. Klancnik, Michael J. Cooney, Neil M. Bressler, Lee M. Jampol, Michael F. Marmor, Adam R. Glassman, Carol L. Shields, Ronald B. Melles and Susan B. Bressler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in JAMA Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JAMA Ophthalmology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JAMA Ophthalmology.

Countries where authors publish in JAMA Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JAMA Ophthalmology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JAMA Ophthalmology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JAMA Ophthalmology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025