Environmental Microbiology Reports

1.5k papers and 42.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Environmental Microbiology Reports in the last decades have received a total of 42.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Microbiology Reports usually cover Ecology (681 papers), Molecular Biology (627 papers) and Plant Science (250 papers) specifically the topics of Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (533 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (193 papers) and Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (132 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Microbiology Reports are Ralf Conrad, Hans W. Paerl, Jef Huisman, Derek R. Lovley, David M. Gordon, Érick Denamur, Olivier Clermont, Julia K. Christenson, Eva S. Lindström and Silke Langenheder.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental Microbiology Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Microbiology Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Microbiology Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Microbiology Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Microbiology Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Microbiology Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Microbiology Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025