Health Care Management Review

2.1k papers and 32.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Health Care Management Review in the last decades have received a total of 32.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Health Care Management Review usually cover General Health Professions (788 papers), Economics and Econometrics (519 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (272 papers) specifically the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (456 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (254 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (196 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health Care Management Review are Mary Chatfield, Cheryl Rathert, Henry Mintzberg, Reuben R. McDaniel, Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben, Sholom Glouberman, Eric S. Williams, William H. McNeill, Howard L. Smith and Heather K. Spence Laschinger.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Health Care Management Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Health Care Management Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health Care Management Review.

Countries where authors publish in Health Care Management Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health Care Management Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health Care Management Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Care Management Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025