Countries where authors publish in Tribology Transactions
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tribology Transactions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tribology Transactions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tribology Transactions more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Tribology Transactions
This network shows the impact of papers published in Tribology Transactions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tribology Transactions.
About Tribology Transactions
The 3.5k papers published in Tribology Transactions in the last decades have received a total of 65.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Tribology Transactions usually cover Mechanics of Materials (2.1k papers), Mechanical Engineering (2.9k papers) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (112 papers) specifically the topics of Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (1.5k papers), Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis (1.2k papers), Lubricants and Their Additives (986 papers), Tribology and Wear Analysis (879 papers), Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (844 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (430 papers), Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis (320 papers) and Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (304 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tribology Transactions are I. Etsion, H. A. Spikes, Piet M. Lugt, Y. Kligerman, Christopher DellaCorte, Yeau‐Ren Jeng, Scott Bair, Hooshang Heshmat, P. M. Cann and G. Halperin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.