CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics

2.6k papers and 56.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics in the last decades have received a total of 56.7k indexed citations. Papers published in CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics usually cover Molecular Biology (734 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (571 papers) and Neurology (554 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (347 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (265 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (197 papers). The most active scholars publishing in CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics are Mark C. Bellingham, George A. Fraser, Thierry Villevieille, G. Mion, Abdul Mannan Baig, Xin Wang, Khalil G. Ghanem, Philip Seeman, Tracey Baskerville and Alison J. Douglas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics.

Countries where authors publish in CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025