Journal of Global Ethics

443 papers and 2.9k indexed citations

About

The 443 papers published in Journal of Global Ethics in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Global Ethics usually cover Sociology and Political Science (248 papers), Political Science and International Relations (229 papers) and Philosophy (74 papers) specifically the topics of Political Philosophy and Ethics (147 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (65 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Global Ethics are Simon Caney, Norbert Götz, Jay Drydyk, Thaddeus Metz, Des Gasper, Fiona Robinson, Edward A. Page, Nigel Dower, Christine M. Koggel and Nanette Funk.

In The Last Decade

Journal of Global Ethics

355 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Global Ethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Global Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Global Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Global Ethics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Global Ethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Global Ethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Global Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026