Countries where authors publish in Journal of Global Ethics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Global Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Global Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Global Ethics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Global Ethics
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Global Ethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Global Ethics.
About Journal of Global Ethics
The 443 papers published in Journal of Global Ethics in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Global Ethics usually cover Political Science and International Relations (229 papers), Development (30 papers), Philosophy (74 papers), Sociology and Political Science (248 papers) and Safety Research (22 papers) specifically the topics of Political Philosophy and Ethics (147 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (65 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (53 papers), Human Rights and Development (51 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (29 papers), International Development and Aid (29 papers), Climate Change and Geoengineering (25 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Global Ethics are Simon Caney, Norbert Götz, Jay Drydyk, Thaddeus Metz, Des Gasper, Fiona Robinson, Edward A. Page, Nigel Dower, Christine M. Koggel and Nanette Funk.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.