Nigel Dower

764 citations
29 papers · 383 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Nigel Dower

28 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Nigel Dower
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Political Science and International Relations 168
  • General Social Sciences 16
  • Sociology and Political Science 188
  • Development 15
  • Education 114
Replace Jay Rothman with:
Jay Rothman United States
Dip Kapoor Canada
Ruth Marshall-Fratani United Kingdom
José Carlos Mariátegui Peru
Richard Gray United Kingdom
Archie Mafeje Egypt
W.M.J. van Binsbergen Netherlands
Sérgio Costa Germany
Martin Köhler Germany
Alex Khasnabish Canada
Nigel Dower relative to Jay Rothman United States Jay Rothman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jay Rothman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nigel Dower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Dower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Dower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Dower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel Dower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Dower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Dower. The network helps show where Nigel Dower may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Nigel Dower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nigel Dower Line = papers co-authored together Nigel Dower links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200379
2 199858
3
Global citizenship : a critical reader
200255
4 200036
5 200823
6 200419
7 199714
8 199214
9 200712
10 201412
11
World poverty: Challenge and response
198311
12
John Macmurray: Critical Perspectives
200211
13
The Ethics of War and Peace
20097
14
Ethics and environmental responsibility
19895
15 20004
16 20043
17 20053
18 19883
19 19883
20 20022

About Nigel Dower

Nigel Dower is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change, Law and Philosophy, having authored 29 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (8 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (7 papers), Climate Change and Geoengineering (6 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (3 papers), Environmental law and policy (3 papers), Human Rights and Development (2 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (2 papers) and International Law and Human Rights (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (168 citations), General Social Sciences (16 citations), Sociology and Political Science (188 citations), Development (15 citations) and Education (114 citations). Nigel Dower has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include John M. Williams, Onora O’Neill, David M. Fergusson, Kenneth P. Jameson, Charles K. Wilber, Hélène Leblanc, Jan Woleński and Matthew E. Gladden. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Values, Journal of Global Ethics, Journal of Religion in Africa, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice and Worldviews Global Religions Culture and Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact