Replace Journal of Human Development and Capabilities with:
Journal of Human Development and CapabilitiesUnited States
Public Organization ReviewUnited States
Public IntegrityUnited States
Anthropology of Work ReviewUnited States
Gender Technology and DevelopmentThailand
Progress in Development StudiesUnited Kingdom
European Management ReviewUnited Kingdom
Forum for Development StudiesNorway
Strategic OrganizationUnited States
Journal of Government InformationUnited States
Journal of Human Development and CapabilitiesUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Contemporary Social Science
Contemporary Social Science · 1×
×1.53.7kSPS
×1.41.2kPSIR
×2.01.5kEE
×1.4954GHP
×1.6825EDUCA
Citations per year, relative to Contemporary Social Science
Contemporary Social Science · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Social Science
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Social Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Social Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Social Science more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Contemporary Social Science
This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Social Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Social Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.