James E. Young

4.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
133 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

James E. Young is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, James E. Young has authored 133 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 73 papers in Social Psychology, 34 papers in Human-Computer Interaction and 25 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in James E. Young's work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (50 papers), AI in Service Interactions (17 papers) and Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (13 papers). James E. Young is often cited by papers focused on Social Robot Interaction and HRI (50 papers), AI in Service Interactions (17 papers) and Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (13 papers). James E. Young collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Japan. James E. Young's co-authors include Ehud Sharlin, Takeo Igarashi, Stela H. Seo, Denise Y. Geiskkovitch, Mark I. Sirkin, Richard Hawkins, Daniel J. Rea, Andrea Bunt, Rasit Eskicioglu and Henrik I. Christensen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Human Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

James E. Young

123 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning 1996 2026 2006 2016 1996 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James E. Young Canada 24 1.5k 690 455 400 269 133 2.6k
Jay David Bolter United States 26 172 0.1× 977 1.4× 186 0.4× 1.2k 2.9× 123 0.5× 100 3.4k
Marie‐Laure Ryan United States 27 153 0.1× 967 1.4× 375 0.8× 277 0.7× 77 0.3× 92 2.7k
Charlotte Linde United States 17 283 0.2× 771 1.1× 272 0.6× 116 0.3× 68 0.3× 37 2.5k
Éric Laurier United Kingdom 30 362 0.2× 1.1k 1.6× 113 0.2× 360 0.9× 55 0.2× 99 2.8k
Martin Gibbs Australia 31 485 0.3× 1.4k 2.0× 325 0.7× 1.8k 4.4× 293 1.1× 162 4.1k
Ray L. Birdwhistell United States 8 631 0.4× 325 0.5× 156 0.3× 237 0.6× 214 0.8× 22 1.9k
Edward Hall United Kingdom 17 571 0.4× 387 0.6× 108 0.2× 206 0.5× 148 0.6× 48 2.0k
Mark Coeckelbergh Austria 36 821 0.6× 717 1.0× 826 1.8× 181 0.5× 1.6k 5.8× 149 4.2k
Lorenza Mondada France 37 547 0.4× 945 1.4× 366 0.8× 639 1.6× 141 0.5× 242 5.9k
Carey Jewitt United Kingdom 30 311 0.2× 1.2k 1.8× 102 0.2× 539 1.3× 197 0.7× 130 5.5k

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Young. The network helps show where James E. Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James E. Young. James E. Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Seo, Stela H., Daniel J. Rea, Takayuki Kanda, et al.. (2024). Symbiotic Society with Avatars (SSA): Toward Empowering Social Interactions Beyond Space and Time. DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)). 1352–1354.
2.
Latulipe, Celine, et al.. (2022). "Music co-listening over video chat to support intergenerational connectedness: An exploratory study". Gerontechnology. 21(1). 1–13. 1 indexed citations
3.
Seo, Stela H., James E. Young, & Pourang Irani. (2020). How are Your Robot Friends Doing? A Design Exploration of Graphical Techniques Supporting Awareness of Robot Team Members in Teleoperation. International Journal of Social Robotics. 13(4). 725–749. 2 indexed citations
4.
Rea, Daniel J., Stela H. Seo, & James E. Young. (2020). Social Robotics for Nonsocial Teleoperation: Leveraging Social Techniques to Impact Teleoperator Performance and Experience. 1(4). 287–295. 12 indexed citations
5.
Seo, Stela H., et al.. (2017). Monocle: Interactive detail-in-context using two pan-and-tilt cameras to improve teleoperation effectiveness. Mspace (University of Manitoba). 962–967. 16 indexed citations
6.
Geiskkovitch, Denise Y., et al.. (2016). Please continue, we need more data: an exploration of obedience to robots. Human-Robot Interaction. 5(1). 82–99. 34 indexed citations
7.
Geiskkovitch, Denise Y., et al.. (2016). Icons for Kids: Can Young Children Understand Graphical Representations of App Store Categories?. Graphics Interface. 163–166. 2 indexed citations
8.
Young, James E., et al.. (2014). Formative assessment in the Grenadian lower secondary school: teachers’ perceptions, attitudes and practices. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice. 21(4). 398–411. 17 indexed citations
9.
Singh, Ashish & James E. Young. (2013). A dog tail for communicating robotic states. Human-Robot Interaction. 417–418. 5 indexed citations
10.
Young, James E., et al.. (2013). Communicating affect via flight path: exploring use of the laban effort system for designing affective locomotion paths. Human-Robot Interaction. 293–300. 47 indexed citations
11.
Young, James E., Kentaro Ishii, Takeo Igarashi, & Ehud Sharlin. (2010). Style by Demonstration: Using Broomsticks and Tangibles to Show Robots How to Follow People. PRISM (University of Calgary). 2 indexed citations
12.
Marquardt, Nicolai, Miguel A. Nacenta, James E. Young, et al.. (2009). The Haptic Tabletop Puck. PRISM (University of Calgary). 85–92. 37 indexed citations
13.
Young, James E., Takeo Igarashi, & Ehud Sharlin. (2008). Puppet Master: designing reactive character behavior by demonstration. 183–191. 15 indexed citations
14.
Young, James E., Richard Hawkins, Ehud Sharlin, & Takeo Igarashi. (2008). Toward Acceptable Domestic Robots: Lessons Learned from Social Psychology. PRISM (University of Calgary). 1 indexed citations
15.
Young, James E., et al.. (2007). Ergonomic Music: Where Does it Fit In?. PRISM (University of Calgary).
16.
Young, James E., Gregor McEwan, Saul Greenberg, & Ehud Sharlin. (2006). Moving a Media Space into the Real World through Group- Robot Interaction. PRISM (University of Calgary).
17.
Young, James E. & Ehud Sharlin. (2006). Sharing Spaces with Robots An Integrated Environment for Human-Robot Interaction. PRISM (University of Calgary). 8 indexed citations
18.
Young, James E. & Ehud Sharlin. (2006). A Mixed Reality Approach to Human-Robot Interaction. PRISM (University of Calgary). 1 indexed citations
19.
Young, James E.. (1999). Bad for the Jews. ˜The œNew York times book review. 38. 2 indexed citations
20.
Young, James E., Chad I. Friedman, & Douglas R. Danforth. (1997). Interleukin-1β Modulates Prostaglandin and Progesterone Production by Primate Luteal Cells in Vitro1. Biology of Reproduction. 56(3). 663–667. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026