Kyoto journal of mathematics

2.0k papers and 21.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Kyoto journal of mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 21.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Kyoto journal of mathematics usually cover Mathematical Physics (1.0k papers), Geometry and Topology (907 papers) and Applied Mathematics (619 papers) specifically the topics of Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (396 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (332 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (263 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Kyoto journal of mathematics are Masayoshi Nagata, Shinzo Watanabe, Hideyasu Sumihiro, Masaki Maruyama, Toshio Yamada, Takaaki Nishida, Akitaka Matsumura, Hirosi Toda, Pierre‐Louis Lions and Sigeru Mizohata.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Kyoto journal of mathematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Kyoto journal of mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Kyoto journal of mathematics.

Countries where authors publish in Kyoto journal of mathematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Kyoto journal of mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Kyoto journal of mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyoto journal of mathematics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025