Free Radical Research

3.6k papers and 137.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in Free Radical Research in the last decades have received a total of 137.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Free Radical Research usually cover Molecular Biology (1.5k papers), Physiology (736 papers) and Biochemistry (596 papers) specifically the topics of Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (501 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (480 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (352 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Free Radical Research are Barry Halliwell, Catherine Rice‐Evans, Geou‐Yarh Liou, Peter Störz, Earl R. Stadtman, John D. Hayes, D. Allan Butterfield, David S. Bredt, Nicholas J. Miller and Lesley I. McLellan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Free Radical Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Free Radical Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Free Radical Research.

Countries where authors publish in Free Radical Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Free Radical Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Free Radical Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Free Radical Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025