Countries where authors publish in Forum Mathematicum
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forum Mathematicum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forum Mathematicum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forum Mathematicum more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Forum Mathematicum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forum Mathematicum.
About Forum Mathematicum
The 1.5k papers published in Forum Mathematicum in the last decades have received a total of 11.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Forum Mathematicum usually cover Algebra and Number Theory (512 papers), Mathematical Physics (794 papers) and Geometry and Topology (683 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Algebra and Geometry (254 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (248 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (206 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (203 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (199 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (171 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (146 papers) and Advanced Harmonic Analysis Research (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forum Mathematicum are Michel Fliess, Peter M. Gruber, William Beckner, Jean-Loup Waldspurger, Lars Diening, Mihail N. Kolountzakis, Máté Matolcsi, Horst Alzer, Avinoam Mann and Abdenacer Makhlouf.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.