Countries where authors publish in Horticultural Science
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Horticultural Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Horticultural Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Horticultural Science more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Horticultural Science
This network shows the impact of papers published in Horticultural Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Horticultural Science.
About Horticultural Science
The 592 papers published in Horticultural Science in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Horticultural Science usually cover Plant Science (524 papers), Horticulture (9 papers) and Biochemistry (39 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (221 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (131 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (101 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Horticultural Science are Nikolaos Tzortzakis, J. Blažek, Robert Pokluda, Ð. Ružić, Tatjana Vujović, Viera Paganová, Martin Koudela, Fatma Koyuncu, F. Paprštein and J. Sedlák.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.