Cartographic Perspectives

502 papers and 4.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 502 papers published in Cartographic Perspectives in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Cartographic Perspectives usually cover Geography, Planning and Development (233 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (33 papers) and Signal Processing (28 papers) specifically the topics of Geographic Information Systems Studies (194 papers), Historical Geography and Cartography (52 papers) and Geography Education and Pedagogy (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cartographic Perspectives are Russell S. Kirby, Alan M. MacEachren, Mark Monmonier, Christina Keller, Tom Patterson, Mark Harrower, Daniel G. Cole, Michael F. Goodchild, Nicholas P. Dunning and Tom Koch.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cartographic Perspectives

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cartographic Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cartographic Perspectives.

Countries where authors publish in Cartographic Perspectives

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cartographic Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cartographic Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cartographic Perspectives more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025