FEMS Microbiology Reviews

2.0k papers and 234.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in FEMS Microbiology Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 234.4k indexed citations. Papers published in FEMS Microbiology Reviews usually cover Molecular Biology (1.1k papers), Ecology (404 papers) and Genetics (370 papers) specifically the topics of Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (305 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (224 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (195 papers). The most active scholars publishing in FEMS Microbiology Reviews are Petr Baldrián, Todd R. Klaenhammer, Markus G. Weinbauer, Simón Silver, Ramon Rosselló‐Móra, Dietrich H. Nies, Waldemar Vollmer, Colin Hill, Alain L. Servin and James D. Oliver.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in FEMS Microbiology Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in FEMS Microbiology Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in FEMS Microbiology Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in FEMS Microbiology Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in FEMS Microbiology Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in FEMS Microbiology Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites FEMS Microbiology Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025