Methods in Ecology and Evolution

2.5k papers and 168.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution in the last decades have received a total of 168.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution usually cover Ecology (1.3k papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (943 papers) and Ecological Modeling (852 papers) specifically the topics of Species Distribution and Climate Change (852 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (704 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (665 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Methods in Ecology and Evolution are Liam J. Revell, Holger Schielzeth, Shinichi Nakagawa, Jonathan S. Lefcheck, Elena N. Ieno, Alain F. Zuur, Chris S. Elphick, David Bryant, Jessica Leigh and Andrés Baselga.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

Countries where authors publish in Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Methods in Ecology and Evolution more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025