The Philosophical Forum

468 papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 468 papers published in The Philosophical Forum in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in The Philosophical Forum usually cover Philosophy (247 papers), Sociology and Political Science (84 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (81 papers) specifically the topics of Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (76 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (68 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (67 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Philosophical Forum are Iris Marion Young, Tommie Shelby, Kai Nielsen, Kathleen Gill, Jürgen Habermas, Amy Allen, Paul Formosa, Terence Irwin, Walter Benjamín and Caroline Whitbeck.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Philosophical Forum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Philosophical Forum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Philosophical Forum.

Countries where authors publish in The Philosophical Forum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Philosophical Forum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Philosophical Forum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Philosophical Forum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025