Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Galtung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Galtung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Galtung more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Galtung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Galtung. The network helps show where Johan Galtung may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johan Galtung
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johan Galtung.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johan Galtung based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Johan Galtung. Johan Galtung is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Galtung, Johan. (2014). The Geopolitics of Peace Education. Learning to Hate the War, to Love Peace, and to Do Something About it. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
2.
Galtung, Johan & Dietrich Fischer. (2013). Johan Galtung : pioneer of peace research. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).19 indexed citations
3.
Galtung, Johan. (2010). EDUCATION AND PEACE-BUILDING. 69. 462–463.1 indexed citations
4.
Galtung, Johan. (2004). Transcend and transform : an introduction to conflict work.47 indexed citations
Galtung, Johan. (2000). Die Zukunft der Menschenrechte : Vision: Verständigung zwischen den Kulturen. Campus Verlag eBooks.
7.
Galtung, Johan. (1999). World/Global/Universal History and the Present Historiography. 141–161.1 indexed citations
8.
Galtung, Johan. (1997). Religions Hard and Soft. CrossCurrents. 47(4). 437–450.7 indexed citations
9.
Galtung, Johan. (1995). La investigacion sobre la paz y el conflicto en los tiempos del colera: diez puntos para los futuros estudios sobre la paz. 10(28). 235–250.1 indexed citations
Galtung, Johan. (1981). World conflict formation processes in the 1980s : Prolegomenon III for a GPID world model.1 indexed citations
14.
Galtung, Johan & Hermann Vetter. (1978). Methodologie und Ideologie : Aufsätze zur Methodologie. Suhrkamp eBooks.1 indexed citations
15.
Galtung, Johan. (1978). Goals, processes, and indicators of development : a project description.2 indexed citations
16.
Galtung, Johan. (1976). The Lome Convention and neo-capitalism. The African Review. 6(1). 33–42.10 indexed citations
17.
Galtung, Johan. (1975). Strukturelle Gewalt : Beiträge zur Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. Rowohlt eBooks.14 indexed citations
18.
Galtung, Johan. (1975). The Dialectics of Education.. Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies.1 indexed citations
19.
Senghaas, Dieter & Johan Galtung. (1972). Imperialismus und strukturelle Gewalt: Analysen über abhängige Reproduktion. Suhrkamp eBooks.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.