Studies in Social Justice

302 papers and 2.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 302 papers published in Studies in Social Justice in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in Social Justice usually cover Sociology and Political Science (157 papers), Political Science and International Relations (52 papers) and General Health Professions (43 papers) specifically the topics of Migration, Refugees, and Integration (26 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (19 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in Social Justice are Nancy Fraser, Peter Nyers, Nicholas De Genova, Ann Travers, Janine Brodie, David J. Harper, Ewen Speed, David Harvey, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella and Jijian Voronka.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in Social Justice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in Social Justice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in Social Justice.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in Social Justice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in Social Justice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in Social Justice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in Social Justice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025