EPL (Europhysics Letters)

20.6k papers and 448.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 20.6k papers published in EPL (Europhysics Letters) in the last decades have received a total of 448.6k indexed citations. Papers published in EPL (Europhysics Letters) usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (8.4k papers), Condensed Matter Physics (5.1k papers) and Materials Chemistry (4.3k papers) specifically the topics of Theoretical and Computational Physics (2.3k papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (2.1k papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (1.8k papers). The most active scholars publishing in EPL (Europhysics Letters) are J. M. V. A. Koelman, David Quéré, P. J. Hoogerbrugge, Dominique d’Humières, Pierre Lallemand, Y. H. Qian, Patrick B. Warren, Pep Español, Giorgio Parisi and Matjaž Perc.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in EPL (Europhysics Letters)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in EPL (Europhysics Letters). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in EPL (Europhysics Letters).

Countries where authors publish in EPL (Europhysics Letters)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in EPL (Europhysics Letters). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in EPL (Europhysics Letters) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites EPL (Europhysics Letters) more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025