Progress in Organic Coatings

8.3k papers and 217.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.3k papers published in Progress in Organic Coatings in the last decades have received a total of 217.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Progress in Organic Coatings usually cover Materials Chemistry (3.6k papers), Polymers and Plastics (3.5k papers) and Organic Chemistry (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (1.9k papers), Self-Healing Polymer Materials (1.5k papers) and Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity (1.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Organic Coatings are W. Funke, Gordon P. Bierwagen, Søren Kiil, Kim Dam‐Johansen, Bahram Ramezanzadeh, Diego Meseguer Yebra, Zeno W. Wicks, M.G.S. Ferreira, D. J. Mills and Charlès M. Hansen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Progress in Organic Coatings

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Organic Coatings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Organic Coatings.

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Organic Coatings

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Organic Coatings. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Organic Coatings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Organic Coatings more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025