Environmental Humanities

329 papers and 4.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 329 papers published in Environmental Humanities in the last decades have received a total of 4.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Humanities usually cover Geography, Planning and Development (190 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (86 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (60 papers) specifically the topics of Geographies of human-animal interactions (186 papers), Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (83 papers) and Exploration of Posthumanist Performativity in Social Sciences (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Humanities are Donna Haraway, Anna Tsing, Thom van Dooren, Eileen Crist, Eben Kirksey, Deborah Bird Rose, Ursula Münster, Jamie Lorimer, Noel Castree and Bruno Latour.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environmental Humanities

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Humanities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Humanities.

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Humanities

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Humanities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Humanities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Humanities more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025