Replace Theory and Practice in Language Studies with:
Theory and Practice in Language StudiesChina
The Reading TeacherUnited States
Foreign Language AnnalsUnited States
Journal of Language Teaching and ResearchChina
Journal of Adolescent & Adult LiteracyUnited States
Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantesCanada
Reading and WritingUnited States
College EnglishUnited States
Teaching in Higher EducationUnited Kingdom
ELT JournalUnited Kingdom
Theory and Practice in Language StudiesChinaView profile →
Citations per field, relative to English Language Teaching
English Language Teaching · 1×
×0.45.6kEDUCA
×0.66.0kLL
×0.53.7kLLT
×0.53.9kDEP
×0.42.9kIS
Citations per year, relative to English Language Teaching
English Language Teaching · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in English Language Teaching
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in English Language Teaching. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in English Language Teaching with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites English Language Teaching more than expected).
Fields of papers published in English Language Teaching
This network shows the impact of papers published in English Language Teaching. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in English Language Teaching.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.