Journal of Emergency Management

659 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 659 papers published in Journal of Emergency Management in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Emergency Management usually cover Sociology and Political Science (367 papers), Emergency Medical Services (239 papers) and General Health Professions (58 papers) specifically the topics of Disaster Management and Resilience (344 papers), Disaster Response and Management (234 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Emergency Management are David A. McEntire, Clayton Wukich, J. Brian Houston, Patric R. Spence, Kenneth A. Lachlan, William Waugh, Thomas E. Drabek, Vincent T. Covello, Ali Nejat and Claire Connolly Knox.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Emergency Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Emergency Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Emergency Management.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Emergency Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Emergency Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Emergency Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Emergency Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025