Health Policy and Technology

694 papers and 7.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 694 papers published in Health Policy and Technology in the last decades have received a total of 7.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Health Policy and Technology usually cover General Health Professions (255 papers), Economics and Econometrics (174 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (120 papers) specifically the topics of Mobile Health Interventions and Applications (111 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (103 papers) and Electronic Health Records Systems (87 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Health Policy and Technology are Francesco Paolucci, Mario Coccia, Alicja Kubanek, Przemysław M. Waszak, Rod Ward, Ofir Ben‐Assuli, Mehmet Top, Tsipi Heart, Wendy L. Currie and Itamar Shabtai.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Health Policy and Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Health Policy and Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Health Policy and Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Health Policy and Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Health Policy and Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Health Policy and Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Health Policy and Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025