Éire-Ireland
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 10%
- Anthropology
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Gender Studies
- Topics
- Irish and British StudiesPhilippine History and CultureScottish History and National Identity
In The Last Decade
Éire-Ireland
271 papers receiving 681 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Sociology and Political Science 818
- History 205
- Anthropology 159
- Literature and Literary Theory 146
- Gender Studies 122
Countries where authors publish in Éire-Ireland
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Éire-Ireland. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Éire-Ireland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Éire-Ireland more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Éire-Ireland
This network shows the impact of papers published in Éire-Ireland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Éire-Ireland.
About Éire-Ireland
The 473 papers published in Éire-Ireland in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Éire-Ireland usually cover Sociology and Political Science (382 papers), History (81 papers) and Anthropology (52 papers) specifically the topics of Irish and British Studies (350 papers), Philippine History and Culture (49 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Éire-Ireland are James S. Donnelly, Tom Inglis, Mary P. Corcoran, Eileen M. Trauth, Mary E. Daly, James M. Smith, Joe Cleary, Breda Gray, Robbie Gilligan and Brian Girvin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.