Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Osteoarchaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Osteoarchaeology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Osteoarchaeology.
About International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
The 2.2k papers published in International Journal of Osteoarchaeology in the last decades have received a total of 34.8k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Osteoarchaeology usually cover Archeology (1.4k papers), Paleontology (637 papers) and Anthropology (476 papers) specifically the topics of Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (1.3k papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (585 papers) and Paleopathology and ancient diseases (459 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Osteoarchaeology are Simon Mays, Dorothée G. Drucker, Marie Balasse, Hervé Bocherens, Simon Hillson, Tony Waldron, Diane E. Hawkey, G. J. R. Maat, Ann Stirland and Donald J. Ortner.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.