The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances

8.2k citations
753 papers · indexed · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy 235
    • Library Science and Administration 152
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 160
    • Web and Library Services 94
    • Library Science and Information Systems 26

The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances

550 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Peers

The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Library and Information Sciences 738
  • Information Systems and Management 973
  • Communication 815
  • Business and International Management 197
  • Strategy and Management 1.5k
Replace Health Information & Libraries Journal with:
Health Information & Libraries Journal United Kingdom
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication India
On the Horizon The International Journal of Learning Futures United States
Field Methods United States
Journal of Mixed Methods Research United States
Education for Information United Kingdom
Aslib Journal of Information Management China
Program electronic library and information systems United Kingdom
Business Information Review United Kingdom
Journal of Information & Knowledge Management India
The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances relative to Health Information & Libraries Journal United Kingdom Health Information & Libraries Journal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Health Information & Libraries Journal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances more than expected).

Fields of papers published in The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances.

About The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances

The 753 papers published in The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances in the last decades have received a total of 8.2k indexed citations . Papers published in The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances usually cover Library and Information Sciences (278 papers), Information Systems (256 papers), Information Systems and Management (47 papers), Communication (44 papers) and Business and International Management (12 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (235 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (160 papers), Library Science and Administration (152 papers), Web and Library Services (94 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (38 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (36 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (30 papers) and Library Science and Information Systems (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances are Colleen Cuddy, Kay Ann Cassell, Marina I. Mercado, John P. Kotter, Bang Nguyen, Sheshadri Chatterjee, Glen E. Holt, Eleni Aravopoulou, Merlin Stone and Sebastián Molinillo.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact