Education Sciences

5.5k papers and 36.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.5k papers published in Education Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 36.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Education Sciences usually cover Education (3.3k papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.1k papers) and Information Systems (751 papers) specifically the topics of Online and Blended Learning (374 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (368 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (359 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Education Sciences are Chung Kwan Lo, Simone Grassini, Blanka Klímová, Ute Kaden, Mamdouh Alenezi, Ammar Y. Alqahtani, Albraa A. Rajkhan, Stamatios Papadakis, Michail Kalogiannakis and John Traxler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Education Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Education Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Education Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Education Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Education Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Education Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Education Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025